Loading
Loading
Your feedback directly shapes Sporos.
Sign in to track your feedback history
Limitation on sentence upon revocation of suspension of sentence; technical violations. Provides that the court shall consider all technical violations that are alleged to have occurred after a prior sentencing or revocation hearing as single technical violation and adjudicate the case as such, with punishment imposed pursuant to relevant law. The bill also prohibits the court from treating multiple technical violations during a single probationary period between such prior sentencing or revocation hearing as separate cases or adjudicate such violations at separate hearings. The bill requires that when a defendant has been taken into custody for an alleged violation for which the court may impose not more than 14 days of active incarceration, the court shall docket such case as soon as practicable, and any such case shall be given precedence on the docket. The bill states that if such violation is not adjudicated within 14 days of the defendant being taken into custody, the defendant shall be admitted to bail, unless (i) such defendant consents to being further detained while awaiting adjudication or sentencing or (ii) the Commonwealth has established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant presents a significant risk of harm to himself or the community based on substance use disorder or serious mental illness and has been referred for residential treatment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the bill provides that no such defendant shall be held in custody awaiting adjudication of or sentencing on such alleged technical violation for longer than 30 days. The bill also expands the list of technical violations and provides that it shall be a defense to an alleged violation if the defendant can show that he has substantially complied with his probation obligations.
Introduced
Jan 22, 2026
Last Action
Mar 9, 2026
Session
VA 2026
Sponsors
1 primary · 0 co
Continued to next session in Courts of Justice (12-Y 3-N)
Senate committee offered
Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB1413)
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
Constitutional reading dispensed (on 1st reading)
Read third time and passed House (62-Y 35-N 0-A)
Read second time
committee substitute agreed to
Engrossed by House - committee substitute
Read first time
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (15-Y 6-N)
Committee substitute printed 26107431D-H1
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (7-Y 3-N)
House subcommittee offered
Assigned HCJ sub: Criminal
Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB1413)
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
Presented and ordered printed 26103278D
Get a plain-English explanation of what this bill does, who it affects, and why it matters.
Continued to next session in Courts of Justice (12-Y 3-N)