Loading
Loading
Your feedback directly shapes Sporos.
Sign in to track your feedback history
Qualified Immunity Act of 2025 This bill provides statutory authority for qualified immunity for law enforcement officers in civil cases involving constitutional violations. Current law provides a statutory civil cause of action against state and local government actors (e.g., law enforcement officers) for violations of constitutional rights, also known as Section 1983 lawsuits. The Supreme Court has also found an implied cause of action against federal law enforcement officers in certain situations (e.g., Fourth Amendment violations), also known as Bivens lawsuits. However, under the judicial doctrine of qualified immunity, government officials performing discretionary duties are generally shielded from civil liability, unless their actions violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known. The bill provides statutory authority for these principles with respect to law enforcement officers. Specifically, under the bill, law enforcement officers are entitled to qualified immunity if (1) at the time of the alleged violation, the constitutional right at issue was not clearly established or the state of the law was not sufficiently clear that any reasonable officer would have known that the conduct was unconstitutional; or (2) a court has held that the specific conduct at issue is constitutional. The bill applies to federal, state, and local law enforcement officers. It also specifies that law enforcement agencies and local governments may not be held liable if their officers are entitled to qualified immunity.
Introduced
Jan 16, 2025
Last Action
Jan 16, 2025
Session
119th Congress
Sponsors
1 primary · 10 co
Passage Probability
2% — Very Low
Introduced in Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Get a plain-English explanation of what this bill does, who it affects, and why it matters.
2%
Estimate based on legislative signals
See what factors are driving this score — cosponsor support, bipartisan backing, committee progress, and more.
Upgrade to ProRead twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.