Loading
Loading
Your feedback directly shapes Sporos.
Sign in to track your feedback history
Laken Riley Act This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to detain certain non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) who have been arrested for burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The bill also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement. Under this bill, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The bill also authorizes state governments to sue for injunctive relief over certain immigration-related decisions or alleged failures by the federal government if the decision or failure caused the state or its residents harm, including financial harm of more than $100. Specifically, the state government may sue the federal government over a decision to release a non-U.S. national from custody;failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews;failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country;violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis; orfailure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States.
Introduced
Jan 3, 2025
Last Action
Feb 10, 2025
Session
119th Congress
Sponsors
1 primary · 54 co
Passage Probability
2% — Very Low
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 10.
Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
Received in the Senate.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 29, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Raskin demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 264 - 159 (Roll no. 6).
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Considered as unfinished business.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 5.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 29.
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Get a plain-English explanation of what this bill does, who it affects, and why it matters.
2%
Estimate based on legislative signals
See what factors are driving this score — cosponsor support, bipartisan backing, committee progress, and more.
Upgrade to ProRead the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 10.
Green, Mark E.
Greene, Marjorie Taylor