Loading
Loading
Your feedback directly shapes Sporos.
Sign in to track your feedback history
Existing law, the Subdivision Map Act, vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency and sets forth procedures governing the local agency's processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative, final, and parcel maps, and the modification of those maps. The act requires prescribed security from a developer if the act or a local ordinance authorizes or requires the furnishing of security in connection with the performance of any act or agreement. Existing law requires the Real Estate Commissioner to make an examination of any subdivision, and to, unless there are grounds for denial, issue to the subdivider a public report authorizing the sale or lease of the lots or parcels within the subdivision. Existing law specifies the grounds for denial, including, among other things, the inability to demonstrate that adequate financial arrangements have been made for all offsite improvements included in the offering or the inability to demonstrate that adequate financial arrangements have been made for any community, recreational, or other facilities included in the offering. This bill would prohibit the Real Estate Commissioner, in issuing a public report for a residential development or project, from requiring the furnishing of a security in connection with the performance of any act or agreement related to an improvement if the Real Estate Commissioner determines that security sufficient to protect the interests of purchasers, owners, and lessees, as necessary, has been furnished to a local agency for the same improvement pursuant to the provisions above requiring security under the Subdivision Map Act.
Introduced
Feb 18, 2025
Last Action
Sep 12, 2025
Session
CA 20252026
Sponsors
1 primary · 0 co
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Wiener.
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 18).
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (July 14).
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B. P. & E.D. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 2).
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and B. P. & E.D.
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1852.)
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 23).
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1627.)
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 30).
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
Read first time. To print.
Get a plain-English explanation of what this bill does, who it affects, and why it matters.
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Wiener.