Loading
Loading
Your feedback directly shapes Sporos.
Sign in to track your feedback history
Existing law, the Reproductive Privacy Act, declares as contrary to the public policy of this state a law of another state that authorizes a person to bring a civil action against a person or entity that engages in certain activities relating to obtaining or performing an abortion. Existing law prohibits the state from applying an out-of-state law to a case or controversy in state court or enforcing or satisfying a civil judgment under the out-of-state law. This bill would specify that the protections applicable to persons who engage in legally protected health care activity, as defined, apply to a person who previously has undertaken one or more acts or omissions while in another United States jurisdiction to aid or encourage, or attempt to aid or encourage, any person in the exercise and enjoyment, or attempted exercise and enjoyment, of rights to reproductive health care services or gender affirming health care services that would have been protected if undertaken in this state and the acts or omissions were permissible under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the person was located at the time of the acts or omissions. Existing law prohibits a state or local law enforcement agency or officer from knowingly arresting or knowingly participating in the arrest of any person for performing, supporting, or aiding in the performance of legally protected health care activity, if the health care activity is lawful in this state. Existing law prohibits a state or local public agency from cooperating with or providing information to an individual or agency from another state or a federal law enforcement agency, as specified, regarding a legally protected health care activity that is lawful in this state. Under existing law, the Governor may surrender, on demand of executive authority of any other state, any person in this state charged in the other state, as specified, with committing an act in this state, or in a 3rd state, intentionally resulting in a crime in the state whose executive authority is making the demand. This bill would authorize the Governor to extradite any person in this state and who is charged in another state only if the acts for which extradition is sought would be punishable by the laws of this state if the consequences claimed to have resulted therefrom in the demanding state had taken effect in this state. The bill would prohibit the Governor from recognizing a request for extradition of a person subject to criminal liability based on the alleged provision or receipt of, assistance in the provision or receipt of, material support for, or in any theory of vicarious, joint, several, or conspiracy liability for any legally protected health care activity, except as specified.
Introduced
Feb 18, 2026
Last Action
Mar 9, 2026
Session
CA 20252026
Sponsors
1 primary · 22 co
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
Read first time. To print.
Get a plain-English explanation of what this bill does, who it affects, and why it matters.
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
Bauer-Kahan
Rubio
Addis
Aguiar-Curry
Ávila Farías
Bonta
Calderon
Elhawary
Irwin
McKinnor
Nguyen
Ortega
Papan
Patel
Pellerin
Quirk-Silva
Celeste Rodriguez
Schiavo
Stefani
Wilson
Menjivar
Pérez
Reyes