Loading
Loading
Your feedback directly shapes Sporos.
Sign in to track your feedback history
Existing law makes it a crime for a person to operate or use an unmanned aerial vehicle, remote-piloted aircraft, or drone at the scene of an emergency for the purpose of viewing the scene or emergency or military personnel, and thereby impede the emergency or military personnel, in the performance of their duties in coping with the emergency. Existing law excuses a local public entity or public employee from liability for damage to an unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system, if the damage was caused while the local public entity or public employee of a local public entity was providing, and the unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system was interfering with, the operation, support, or enabling of any emergency service, as specified. Existing law makes everyone responsible for an injury occasioned to another by their want of ordinary care or skill in the management of their property or person, as provided. This bill would prohibit a person from operating or using an unmanned aerial vehicle, remote-piloted aircraft, or drone to knowingly or recklessly interfere with a wildfire suppression or law enforcement or emergency response efforts related to a wildfire suppression, except as provided. The bill would authorize the Attorney General or a county counsel or city attorney to bring civil action to enforce the prohibition and authorize a prevailing plaintiff to recover civil penalties, injunctive relief, or reasonable attorney's fees and costs, as specified.
Introduced
Feb 9, 2026
Last Action
Mar 3, 2026
Session
CA 20252026
Sponsors
1 primary · 0 co
Re-referred to Com. on E.M.
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.M. Read second time and amended.
Referred to Coms. on E.M and JUD.
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
Read first time. To print.
Get a plain-English explanation of what this bill does, who it affects, and why it matters.
Re-referred to Com. on E.M.